Elicitation of criteria weights maximising the stability of pairwise outranking statements
نویسندگان
چکیده
We propose an indirect approach for assessing criteria importance weights from overall outranking statements that a decision-maker may acknowledge in a Multiple Criteria Decision Aid process. Our approach takes advantage of the bipolar characteristic valuation of the overall outranking and the stability of its associated median-cut, crisp outranking relation. Numerical criteria importance weights are inferred with the help of a mixed integer linear programming model for which we present tests results under different configurations and tunings. keywords: multiple criteria decision analysis; disaggregation; criteria importance elicitation; stable bipolar-valued outranking. ∗Corresponding author 2 Raymond Bisdorff, Patrick Meyer, and Thomas Veneziano
منابع مشابه
Inverse Analysis from a Condorcet Robustness Denotation of Valued Outranking Relations
In this article we develop an indirect approach for assessing criteria significance weights from the robustness of the significance that a decision maker acknowledges for his pairwise outranking statements in a Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding process. The main result consists in showing that with the help of a mixed integer linear programming model this kind of a priori knowledge is sufficien...
متن کاملConcordant outranking with multiple criteria of ordinal significance A contribution to robust multicriteria aid for decision
In this paper we address the problem of aggregating outranking statements from multiple preference criteria of ordinal significance. The concept of ordinal concordance of a global outranking situation is defined and an operational test for its presence is developed. Finally, we propose a new kind of robustness analysis for global outranking statements integrating classical dominance, ordinal an...
متن کاملA Common Weight Multi-criteria Decision analysis-data Envelopment Analysis Approach with Assurance Region for Weight Derivation from Pairwise Comparison Matrices
Deriving weights from a pairwise comparison matrix (PCM) is a subject for which a wide range of methods have ever been presented. This paper proposes a common weight multi criteria decision analysis-data envelopment analysis (MCDA-DEA) approach with assurance region for weight derivation from a PCM. The proposed model has several merits over the competing approaches and removes the drawbacks of...
متن کاملEnvironmental Planning for Wind Power Plant Site Selection using a Fuzzy PROMETHEE-Based Outranking Method in Geographical Information System
Selection of suitable sites for wind power plants is one of the most important decision on wind resources development. Site selection for the establishment of large wind power plants requires spatial evaluation taking technical, economic, and environmental considerations into account. This study has applied a combination of PROMETHEE and Fuzzy AHP methods in a geographical information system en...
متن کاملDoes technique matter; a pilot study exploring weighting techniques for a multi-criteria decision support framework
BACKGROUND There is an increased interest in the use of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support regulatory and reimbursement decision making. The EVIDEM framework was developed to provide pragmatic multi-criteria decision support in health care, to estimate the value of healthcare interventions, and to aid in priority-setting. The objectives of this study were to test 1) the influenc...
متن کامل